NEO Miscues

Find a model with an issue? Post your findings here.
JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

Please show any issues you have with quality control or errors with NEO models in this thread.

Remember photos of the equivalent 1/1 are very important to demonstrate the issue with the model.

Constructive critiscm is the aim
Jeff
Image

bomber21
Posts: 3719
Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2009 10:11 am
Location: Athens,GR

Re: NEO

Post by bomber21 »

This RS2 should not have passed the Quality Control.

Image

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO

Post by sheepCrusher »

Maybe this thread should have a different title to distinguish it from a regular NEO thread. Sometimes they do good stuff too. Like "NEO Issues" or something.
Last edited by sheepCrusher on Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO

Post by sheepCrusher »

Dodge Dart Swinger, met.-beige/beige, LE 500 1973
Model Car World Exclusive
Image
Quoting DeadCanDanceR
The front end angle is not correct, and neither is that low roof line. It looks chopped!
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher »

1972 Pontiac Grand Prix Hurst SSJ
Image
Quoting 43rdMuscle
The peak seems too flat. The Hood/Bonnet is not correctly proportionate (seems too short).
Image

Seems like they are missing a set of headlights too. Unless I have the wrong picture. Anyone?


Upon further review perhaps this car is falsely judged. Here is the one that looks like they modeled from.
Image

Guess this thread can be NEO's savior as well. If there was a previously thought wrong car and someone can show NEO was correct that would be helpful too.
Last edited by sheepCrusher on Sat Apr 02, 2011 1:49 pm, edited 3 times in total.
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

scalainj
Site Admin
Posts: 30102
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:01 am
Location: Kent & East Sussex

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by scalainj »

sheepCrusher wrote:Maybe this thread should have a different title to distinguish it from a regular NEO thread. Sometimes they do good stuff too. Like NEO Issues or something.
Thats done - i've added miscues to the title

Remember we need to add equivalent 1/1 pics to illustrate the points made

Cheers

Andy
Andy

British roads have history. Some were built by the Romans. British road investment being what it is, they have only been re-surfaced a few times since.

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher »

LTD
Image
Quoting k1w1taxi
WOW, even this car looks wrong to me!
The front fenders are too high, the back's slant it too severe, maybe tail-lamps too low, what a mess.
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher »

The infamous Camaro and its roofline.
Image
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

sheepCrusher
Posts: 5515
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:36 am
Location: Houston, Texas, USA

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by sheepCrusher »

If anybody knows the correct pictures of that Dart, LTD and Camaro I will stick them in my posts.
The dog wet on the picnic basket!

DeadCanDanceR
Posts: 27150
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Guadalajara, MEXICO

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by DeadCanDanceR »

Wrong size whitewall for that year!

Image


Nothing better than an original ad to illustrate it:

Image






The day Neo fixes the whitewall size on this model, I'll gladly buy it... :geek:
-Julio-

Image

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

sheepCrusher wrote:LTD
Image
Quoting k1w1taxi
WOW, even this car looks wrong to me!
The front fenders are too high, the back's slant it too severe, maybe tail-lamps too low, what a mess.
I agree on the back window being to slanted. The Front fenders look off as well.

Image
Jeff
Image

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

sheepCrusher wrote:The infamous Camaro and its roofline.
Image
The Neo Camaro looks more like a Firebird. Its a mess.
Image
Jeff
Image

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO

Post by JSB33 »

sheepCrusher wrote:Dodge Dart Swinger, met.-beige/beige, LE 500 1973
Model Car World Exclusive
Image
Quoting DeadCanDanceR
The front end angle is not correct, and neither is that low roof line. It looks chopped!
Yes and yes. So close but so far away
Image
Jeff
Image

The CSL
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:11 pm
Location: Plymouth, UK

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by The CSL »

I still reckon the roof height is fine, as the windshield looks to be in proportion, but the header rail above the side windows is too thick.
Image

Ubradewunner
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Ubradewunner »

I'm observing this Sub-forum route with great intrigue... One thing I've noticed about the comparisons to the 1/1's here, is that due to the photographed angles the compare and contrast pics shown in such cases, opinion can perhaps teeter more unfairly.
Last edited by Ubradewunner on Sun Apr 03, 2011 2:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Chris
:-)

scalainj
Site Admin
Posts: 30102
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 8:01 am
Location: Kent & East Sussex

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by scalainj »

It's exactly why we wanted this to be a discussion with examples.

Sometimes the manufacturers get it wrong, sometimes we do

Here we can discuss this through without rancour and come to a opinion we can base on fact

Andy
Andy

British roads have history. Some were built by the Romans. British road investment being what it is, they have only been re-surfaced a few times since.

Ubradewunner
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Ubradewunner »

Stating the obvious like the silly sausage I am, :idea: it probs will be best if we photograph our models at the same angle etc. as the 1/1 example we're judging, as such real cars aren't erm as obtainable as our 1/43's :) (told you I was a silly sausage)...
Chris
:-)

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

The CSL wrote:I still reckon the roof height is fine, as the windshield looks to be in proportion, but the header rail above the side windows is too thick.
Look at the side window opening. It like a chopped top.

I have a feeling having grown up around this car, it makes it a bit easier to spot an issue right away.
Jeff
Image

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

Ubradewunner wrote:Stating the obvious like the silly sausage I am, :idea: it probs will be best if we photograph our models at the same angle etc. as the 1/1 example we're judging, as such real cars aren't erm as obtainable as our 1/43's :) (told you I was a silly sausage)...
That would be ideal, Mr Sausage :mrgreen:
Jeff
Image

The CSL
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Oct 06, 2010 6:11 pm
Location: Plymouth, UK

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by The CSL »

JSB33 wrote:
The CSL wrote:I still reckon the roof height is fine, as the windshield looks to be in proportion, but the header rail above the side windows is too thick.
Look at the side window opening. It like a chopped top.

I have a feeling having grown up around this car, it makes it a bit easier to spot an issue right away.
That's what I mean. The side window is lower, making a thicker header rail.

Leaving it up to you to see if this is closer to reality, because as you say, you've been exposed to these cars. Just a crude photoshop to bring the top of the window to meet the windshield line, as it does in the 1:1 picture. I won't argue the front being too angled, as it's obvious even to me.

EDIT: This is a second attempt, as looking at the 1:1 on this page, the windscreen wasn't wide enough either, leaving a thick a-pillar. Actually I think that's it. Rather than being too low a roofline, the pillar work is so off that whereas the 1:1 has a narrow A-pillar and the door meets close to the pillar line, this model's window line is further back from the door shutline and then with the thick header rail as well, it throws off the proportions all together. If I were Neo, I'd rework the whole glass area, as front and side it's way off.

Image
Image

DeadCanDanceR
Posts: 27150
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 3:34 pm
Location: Guadalajara, MEXICO

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by DeadCanDanceR »

Great photoshopping skills!!! ;) It now looks much better than NEO's version!
The CSL wrote: ...If I were Neo, I'd rework the whole glass area, as front and side it's way off...
...they should probably consider doing a Dart convertible instead... 8-)
-Julio-

Image

Ubradewunner
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Ubradewunner »

At the moment, the Neo model 1/43's I've purchased so far, seem bang-on. Being, Porsche 930 Flatnose, and Saab 9000 Turbo. However, (sighs)... I've been planning on buying a black E39 Beemer lately, and like so many other models Neo has made, there seems to be a problem with the crispness of their edge-lines - which seem to either be too soft, thick or bulge. I suppose this is due to resin materials in comparison to metal. The best analogy I can come up with at the moment, is if you've ever got bored at school many moons ago, and made a small scale model car out of "bluetack", then there's a similarity there in their outcomes. :roll:
Chris
:-)

JSB33
Site Admin
Posts: 43285
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 11:25 am
Location: Bedford
Contact:

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by JSB33 »

The CSL wrote:
JSB33 wrote:
The CSL wrote:I still reckon the roof height is fine, as the windshield looks to be in proportion, but the header rail above the side windows is too thick.
Look at the side window opening. It like a chopped top.

I have a feeling having grown up around this car, it makes it a bit easier to spot an issue right away.
That's what I mean. The side window is lower, making a thicker header rail.

Leaving it up to you to see if this is closer to reality, because as you say, you've been exposed to these cars. Just a crude photoshop to bring the top of the window to meet the windshield line, as it does in the 1:1 picture. I won't argue the front being too angled, as it's obvious even to me.

EDIT: This is a second attempt, as looking at the 1:1 on this page, the windscreen wasn't wide enough either, leaving a thick a-pillar. Actually I think that's it. Rather than being too low a roofline, the pillar work is so off that whereas the 1:1 has a narrow A-pillar and the door meets close to the pillar line, this model's window line is further back from the door shutline and then with the thick header rail as well, it throws off the proportions all together. If I were Neo, I'd rework the whole glass area, as front and side it's way off.

Image
Amazing what you can do with a bit of Photoshopping in that you did a better job in an afternoon than NEO did with unlimited time.
Ubradewunner wrote:At the moment, the Neo model 1/43's I've purchased so far, seem bang-on. Being, Porsche 930 Flatnose, and Saab 9000 Turbo. However, (sighs)... I've been planning on buying a black E39 Beemer lately, and like so many other models Neo has made, there seems to be a problem with the crispness of their edge-lines - which seem to either be too soft, thick or bulge. I suppose this is due to resin materials in comparison to metal. The best analogy I can come up with at the moment, is if you've ever got bored at school many moons ago, and made a small scale model car out of "bluetack", then there's a similarity there in their outcomes. :roll:
You will always get crisper lines with Resin than Diecast metal.
It wasn't the materials fault for what they did. :lol:
Jeff
Image

Ubradewunner
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 4:07 pm

Re: NEO Miscues

Post by Ubradewunner »

Deja vu :D (...told you I was a silly sausage)...
Chris
:-)

Post Reply